Comparison
Bits vs ComplyAdvantage
ComplyAdvantage is a financial crime risk platform built on its own screening data, with transaction and payment monitoring. Bits covers the full customer lifecycle, from KYB and KYC onboarding with registries and eIDs to risk scoring, monitoring and cases.
Choose Bits if
You want onboarding, registries, eIDs, risk scoring, monitoring and cases in one platform, instead of a screening layer you connect to other tools.
Choose ComplyAdvantage if
You mainly need name and payment screening on proprietary data at scale, and you already handle onboarding and identity verification elsewhere.
Side by side
KYC identity verification
Yes. eIDs such as BankID and MitID built in, plus ID document checks through integrated providers
Not a core product. Screening only
KYB, registries and UBOs
Yes. Registry data and UBO mapping built in, across the Nordics and Europe
Partial. Screens companies and the owners you supply. No registry data or UBO verification
Hosted no-code onboarding flow
Yes. Brandable no-code onboarding flow with questionnaires
No. Integration by API, batch or SFTP
PEP, sanctions and adverse media
Yes. Built into onboarding and ongoing monitoring
Yes. Core product on proprietary data
Ongoing monitoring and periodic reviews
Yes. Data updated daily, with review intervals per risk level
Yes. Automated re-screening with dynamic risk scores
Customer risk scoring
Yes. Your own variables and weights on a 1.0 to 4.0 scale, with models per market
Yes. Configurable client risk rating
Transaction monitoring
Yes. Rules read the customer’s risk score and history
Yes. Real time, on the Enterprise plan
Case management
Yes. Cases collect the customer record, triggered rules and linked transactions
Yes. Up to eight review stages and bulk decisions
Workflow automation across modules
Yes. Procedures connect modules and your own systems without code
Partial. AI agents clear routine alerts. No general orchestration builder found
Credit decisioning
Partial. Credit data can feed onboarding flows and rules
Not a core product
Regulatory reporting
goAML SAR and STR reports for Sweden and Finland
SAR and CTR support in transaction monitoring
Data providers
60+ built-in data sources
Proprietary risk data. No third-party marketplace
API
REST API and webhooks
REST API, webhooks and batch
Pricing
Not public. Free sandbox trial
Starter from $99 a month for screening and monitoring. Enterprise on quote
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
London, with hubs in New York, Lisbon, Singapore and Cluj-Napoca
Where ComplyAdvantage is strong
Proprietary risk data with fast updates, recognised by analysts for screening and adverse media.
Large-scale real-time transaction monitoring and payment screening, plus fraud detection on the same platform.
A low self-serve entry price and AI agents that clear routine alerts.
Where Bits differs
Bits covers KYB and KYC onboarding natively, with registries, eIDs, questionnaires and a hosted onboarding flow.
Bits Procedures automate across modules and your own systems, not only alert clearing.
Bits brings many data providers into one workflow, while ComplyAdvantage is a single proprietary data source.
Sources
This comparison is maintained by Bits Technology and based on public information on the date above. Vendor claims are their own, and products change, so check each vendor’s website for current details.
More comparisons
Bits vs Sumsub
Bits vs Sumsub: compare KYB, KYC, screening, risk scoring, transaction monitoring and automation for regulated financial companies in Europe.
Bits vs Taktile
Bits vs Taktile: a ready-made AML compliance platform compared with a general decision engine. KYB, KYC, screening, risk scoring, monitoring and pricing.